|
|
A new maternity care scheme in Riverside gives women continuity of care and reduces hospital costs For many years women have complained about the fragmentation of their care and the lack of carers during pregnancy, labour and the puerperium. Micklethwaite, Beard and Shaw 19785 `She would like, if it were possible, to have someone around her during labour who had given her some antenatal care.' Short Report 19802 `We recognize the difficulties of providing continuity of care throughout pregnancy and labour but consider that a measure of it can be obtained by better organization.' MSAC 19824 RCOG 19827 Parents Magazine 19866 (9,000 replies) `Good communication between parents and the medical staff were helped where women saw the same doctor and midwife regularly ... most mothers saw different people at almost every antenatal visit and were delivered by total strangers. While full of praise for the care they received, many women wished they could have had more continuity of care through pregnancy and beyond.' Now, at last they are being listened to. The obstetricians and midwives of Riverside Health Authority from January 1989 are starting far-reaching changes in the way they deliver maternity care, which they see as the spearhead for future patterns of maternity care in the United Kingdom. The new scheme Under the new scheme most maternity care (except delivery) will take place either in, or near the woman's home. Once she has been and referred her pregnancy to her GP, the woman's next brush with the maternity services will be when she receives a letter detailing the team of six midwives who will care for her throughout her pregnancy, labour and puerperium. She will be given a photo of `her' midwives and a date and a time when one of the midwives will visit her at home to take her obstetric history, a blood sample and plan the schedule of visits she will have during her pregnancy. Sometimes her antenatal consultation will be with the midwife team, sometimes with her GP and The object is for her never to meet more than these eight health professionals plus the health visitor who will be working closely with the midwives during her pregnancy and labour. Indeed the midwives and health visitors will all be working in the same geographical patches since one of the aims of the scheme is to ensure an easier postnatal transfer to the health visitors and for the health visitors and midwives to work more closely together.The woman will either be seen at home or at a local health clinic, where her obstetrician will also visit occasionally. Here she will also attend parentcraft classes and after the baby is born, mother and toddler groups, breast feeding clubs and nutritional meetings, such as `Eating healthily on a budget' or `Healthy eating without cooking', because the teams will be working closely with a dietician. When the woman thinks she is in labour, having got to know the six midwives in her team during pregnancy, the woman will bleep the midwife team and whichever of the midwives is on call will answer the bleep. The usual practice will be for the midwife to visit the woman at home and assess the progress of the labour. Once it is appropriate for the woman to be transferred to hospital she and the midwife will set off with the partner, relatives and/or friends, probably by ambulance, but by car if available. Once the midwife and the mother have arrived at the West London Hospital, the midwife will continue care - she has been writing the woman's notes (which the woman will have been carrying since the beginning of her pregnancy) - with referral to the medical staff if necessary. The midwife will stay with the mother during labour and deliver the baby - the time needed should not be too great if she has judged the progress of labour well. According to the work of Klein3, when women are assessed in early labour at home they spend less time in the delivery ward, have more normal deliveries and need less analgesia than women who spend most of their labour in the labour ward. Once the baby has been delivered, preparations will be put in train for transfer home. The baby will be examined by the paediatrician on call and once all the necessary documentation has been carried out the new family and midwife will all transfer back home. Postnatal care will be given by the same team of midwives who, by now the mother will know very well. Obviously if the mother is unable to come home early she will stay in hospital, but she will be visited by `her' midwives while she is on the postnatal ward. The benefitsIt is thought that the benefits for women will be that they will enjoy being able to get to know their midwives. Their reactions are being assessed with the use of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Score at approximately six weeks following delivery and the results will be compared with those obtained from women prior to the start of the scheme. The midwives' job satisfaction levels are being assessed with a questionnaire which was given out to all midwives prior to the inception of the scheme. This will be distributed again once the scheme has been in operation for about nine months to see if there are any changes in attitudes of the midwives. It is interesting that although no advertisements have yet been put out for midwife team members, every post brings letters from midwives all over the United Kingdom applying for a position in one of the teams. The midwives, it seems, can hardly contain themselves in their eagerness to start working in this way. An example of one off duty is shown in Figure 1. The off duty will be planned for a year in advance and there will nearly always be a member of the team on holiday so that usually there will be five midwives working at any time; the midwives will aim to book six new women each week, to deliver six women each week and give postnatal care for the six women who deliver each week.
Many GPs are enthusiastic about the teams since they are looking forward to working more closely with midwives. They will be able to contact them at any time (as can the women) and they will be assured that they will be speaking to a midwife they know. They feel that communications will be much better under the new scheme. The obstetrician who will be medically supporting the team, Mr Roger Marwood, is happy to be working closely with his midwife colleagues; he sees the teams as providing a more intimate experience for women within the safety of the present hospital set up. This new scheme is the brain child of the Director of Midwifery Services, Suzanne Truttero. She is anxious to see midwives practising their role fully for the benefit of both women and the midwifery profession. The Health Authority is also happy to see women occupying maternity beds for shorter lengths of time than previously, because this could enable great cost savings to be made. The Health Authority has recently rationalized its maternity services and this scheme fits in well with its basic philosophy to decentralise and improve the quality of care, and at the same time become more cost effective. Previous research has shown that women cared for in this way seem to need less antenatal admissions and less analgesia.' The health visitors are also looking forward to working more closely with their midwife colleagues. Most of them feel that what is happening today in Riverside, will tomorrow be the norm for all pregnant women. The philosophy underlying Riverside's approach is that all women are entitled to be cared for by health professionals they have been able to get to know during their pregnancy and that it is iniquitous that so many women are cared for by strangers during one of their most intimate experiences. References 1. Flint, C., Poulengeris, P. (1987). `The Know Your Midwife Report.' Pub 49 Peckarmans Wood. London. 2. HMSO. (1980). Second Report from the Social Services Committee. Session (1979-80), Perinatal and Neonatal Mortality. 19th June.HMSO. 3. Klein, M., Lloyd, I., Redman C., Bull, M., Turnbull, A. C. (1983). `A comparison of lowrisk women booked for delivery in two different systems of care.' British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 90, pp. 118-28. 4. Maternity Services Advisory Committee (1982). `Maternity care inaction. Part 1 - Antenatal Care.' Crown Copyright. 5. Micklethwaite, Lady P, Beard, Professor R., Shaw, Kathleen (1978). `Expectations of a pregnant woman in relation to her treatment.' British Medical Journal. 2, pp.188-191. 6. Parents Magazine (1986). `BIRTH - 9000 mothers speak out. Birth Survey 1986 - results.' No 128 November. 7. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (1982). `Report of the RCOG working party on antenatal and intrapartum care.' March 1989. |
|